Today there is much less to choose between Android and iPhone, but most users assume that Google does more tracking than it does, this time not…

Google just revealed Android 15 Beta 1, and it’s an update that stands out from a security and privacy perspective, especially since it’s something that even recent iPhones can’t match. There is a hardware component here, while we can expect it to come to the Google Pixel, Samsung and other device owners will have to wait and see.

As I previewed last month, Google is taking privacy to the next level with a defense against secret cell tracking and interception technologies. This is provided through an interface between the mobile radio modem and the Android operating system, which requires the OEM of the handsets to include a compatible modem and the necessary operating system interface.

MORE FORBESWhy you should stop sending texts from your iMessage appFor Zach Doffman

This is a weak point of smartphones. Once a mobile channel is opened, the device is programmed to use it openly. Devices connect to multiple towers and display connection strength to optimize performance. Interception tricks a device into leaving its legitimate network and connecting to a local radio network that has a strong and available signal. Traditionally, these platforms have relied on insecure 2G communications to which all devices would fail as conops. But this is a relatively easy door to close and for a smart adversary to detect. Newer options keep 4G.

The new Android cellular defense comes in two parts, albeit with the same goal. The first is a user warning when a network repeatedly pings a device to get its phone IMSI or SIM IMEI ID. While this is not unusual from time to time, frequent pings may suggest an attempt to track the phone or take it to a less secure network.

This is where the second part of this update starts restricting cellular connections to encrypted only. When cellular interception platforms move phones off public networks to high-powered but localized alternatives, encryption is removed or materially reduced to allow potential interception of calls, data and texts.

Google has dabbled in these security features since Android 12, largely preventing devices from failing to low-level mobile communications with limited encryption, but these settings weren’t easy to use and poorly understood. Google is now putting this kind of defense front and center, and it’s a game changer.

Apple offers 2G blocking on iPhones to defend against legacy Stingray interception devices, which drop phones into an almost unencrypted 2G communications channel, but this is only done in its ultra-secure blocking mode. EFF described this as a big step toward protecting iOS users from fake base station attacks, which have been used as a vector to install spyware like Pegasus.

MORE FORBESGoogle suddenly issues a new warning ahead of the iPhone’s iOS 18 updateFor Zach Doffman

Newer interception platforms operate on 4G and present a different level of challenge to spying capabilities. On the other hand, 5G offers much better device security; although with phones constantly bouncing between 5G and LTE, rooting a phone from a 5G connection is very doable and unlikely to cause concern for users.

Pixel users can expect to see these features once Android 15 hits the streets. I’d normally expect Samsung to follow suit, but maybe not. EFF has criticized Samsung in the past, for not making any moves to include 2G switching in vanilla Android… mistakes in acting [that] suggests that Samsung considers the security and privacy of its users an afterthought. Those who are concerned about the security and privacy of their mobile devices should consider using other hardware.

As the release of Android 15 approaches, more details will emerge, but Google’s security and privacy advancements really seem to be one of its main acts…

Epic Games has proposed a measure that would prevent Google from restricting the distribution of third-party apps outside of the Google Play Store on Android devices after proving that Google had an illegal monopoly on Android app distribution markets .

Epic suggests competition on the Android mobile platform would be opened up if the court orders Google to allow the distribution of third-party app stores for six years on the Google Play Store and prevents Google from entering into any agreements with device manufacturers let it stop from preloading third-party app stores. That would benefit both mobile developers and users, Epic argued in a broad proposal that would greatly limit Google’s control over the Android app ecosystem.

U.S. District Court Judge James Donato will ultimately decide the terms of the injunction. Google has until May 3 to respond to Epic’s submission.

A Google spokesperson confirmed to Ars that Google still plans to appeal the verdict even though Google already agreed to a $700 million settlement with consumers and states following the Epic win.

“Epic’s filing in US Federal Court shows again that it simply wants the benefits of Google Play without having to pay for it,” a Google spokesperson said. “We continue to challenge the verdict, as Android is an open mobile platform that faces fierce competition from Apple’s App Store, as well as app stores on Android devices, computers and game consoles.”

If Donato accepts Epic’s proposal, Google would have to grant equal access to the Android operating system and platform features to all developers, not just developers who distribute apps through Google Play. This would allow third-party app stores to own app updates, updating all apps downloaded from their stores as seamlessly as Google Play updates.

Under Epic’s terms, any app downloaded from anywhere would work identically to apps downloaded from Google Play, without Google imposing any unnecessary distribution fees. Similarly, developers could offer their own in-app purchase options and inform users of out-of-app purchase options, without having to use Google APIs or pay additional fees to Google .

Notably, Epic filed its lawsuit after Google pulled the Epic game Fortnite from the Google Play Store because Epic tried to offer an “Epic Direct Payment” option for in-game purchases.

“Google must also allow developers to communicate directly with their consumers, including linking from their app to a website to make purchases and get offers,” Epic said in a blog post. “Google should not use fake compliance programs like User Choice Billing to prevent competing payment options within an app or on a developer’s website.”

Not surprisingly, Epic’s proposed demand includes an “anti-retaliation” section specifically intended to protect Epic from any subsequent retaliation. If Donato agrees to the terms, Google would be in violation of the injunction if the tech giant fails to show that it is not “treating Epic differently than other developers” by making it “disproportionately difficult or costly” for Epic to develop , upgrade and market. your apps on Android.

This part of the mandate would seem important since, last month, Epic announced that an Epic Games Store would “come to iOS and Android” later this year. According to Inc, Epic told attendees at the Game Developers Conference that its app distribution platform will be the “first cross-platform store focused on games” that will work on “Android, iOS, PC and macOS.”